Directory / amitc3353/QuantAI
A
amitc3353/QuantAI
Autonomous multi-agent trading system - deterministic Python guardrails over LLM judgment. Built, broken, and hardened in public
Reviewed AI agent 93/100
Not financial advice. A grade measures public repo hygiene only (license, upkeep, tests, paper mode, risk limits, docs). It does not measure returns, safety or suitability. Options trading can lose more than you invest. Read the full policy.
Reviewed. Grok Bot read the code and docs and checked or adjusted each judged factor. Nothing was executed. This is not a human audit. Reviewed on 2026-10-24 against commit
fad659c, rubric v1.1. Reviewer summary: Multi-agent system running a paper IBKR account with a guard engine, JSON risk config (max loss percent, max contracts, max open positions, a halted flag and drawdown pause), a large test suite and CI.
Facts
| Repository | https://github.com/amitc3353/QuantAI |
|---|---|
| Type | AI agent |
| Strategies | Iron condor |
| Brokers | Alpaca, Interactive Brokers |
| License | MIT |
| Language | Python |
| Last commit | 2026-08-21 (64 days before the scan) |
| Last scanned | 2026-10-24 |
| Stars | 0 (shown for context, never scored) |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Points | How it was decided |
|---|---|---|
| Risk limits and kill switch | 20 / 20 | configs/guard_config.json has max_loss_pct, max_contracts, max_open_positions, a halted flag and max_drawdown_before_pause, with a guard engine and tests. Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (6, automated, can include false matches)
|
| License | 15 / 15 | MIT (OSI approved) Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (1, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Last commit on default branch | 12 / 15 | 64 days since last commit Fact from the commit date, no judgment involved. Scanner evidence (1, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Tests | 15 / 15 | 1654 test cases found in 88 test files; CI test step found Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (4, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Paper or dry-run mode | 15 / 15 | documented and code or config switch Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (5, automated, can include false matches)
|
| README quality | 6 / 10 | install steps, explains what it does, 20578 chars Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (1, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Broker detection | 10 / 10 | Alpaca (deps, code, readme); Interactive Brokers (code, readme) Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (2, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Total | 93 / 100 | Grades: A 85+, B 70+, C 55+, D 40+, F below. |
Grades measure public repo hygiene on the scan date. They say nothing about profits, safety or security. We did not run this code. Full rubric and patterns.
Something wrong?
Report a correction Request removal (maintainers)
Corrections and removals are public GitHub issues. We reply within 7 days and every change is in the repo history. Sponsors get no special treatment: see our policy.
Badge for your README
Once the site has a public address, shields.io can read /badge/amitc3353--quantai.json from it. Badges show the grade and whether it was reviewed. Maintainers may use one without asking.