Directory / Alexanderk30/OpenclawDerivativeTrading
Alexanderk30/OpenclawDerivativeTrading
Multi-agent options trading system - 8 coordinated AI agents executing Iron Condor, Credit Spread, and Wheel strategies via Alpaca with ML signal validation and risk management
f429c6d, rubric v1.1. Reviewer summary: Multi-strategy bot with a real risk manager: daily loss limit, per-trade risk, portfolio heat and an emergency_stop that closes all positions. Defaults to Alpaca paper. Last commit is over 180 days old.
Facts
| Repository | https://github.com/Alexanderk30/OpenclawDerivativeTrading |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Strategies | The wheel, Iron condor, Credit spreads |
| Brokers | Alpaca, Interactive Brokers |
| License | MIT plus an appended disclaimer |
| Language | Python |
| Last commit | 2026-04-15 (192 days before the scan) |
| Last scanned | 2026-10-24 |
| Stars | 1 (shown for context, never scored) |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Points | How it was decided |
|---|---|---|
| Risk limits and kill switch | 20 / 20 | src/risk/risk_manager.py enforces max daily loss and has emergency_stop(); limits live in config/risk_posture.json. Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (6, automated, can include false matches)
|
| License | 15 / 15 | The LICENSE file is the MIT text with an educational disclaimer appended. The grant is unchanged. GitHub reports NOASSERTION because of the extra paragraph. Reviewer adjusted this factor (scanner said 7). Scanner evidence (1, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Last commit on default branch | 4 / 15 | 192 days since last commit Fact from the commit date, no judgment involved. Scanner evidence (1, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Tests | 10 / 15 | 45 test cases found in 5 test files; CI test step not found Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (3, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Paper or dry-run mode | 15 / 15 | config/settings.py defaults to the Alpaca paper endpoint and the repo ships an in-memory paper trading simulator. Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (3, automated, can include false matches)
|
| README quality | 10 / 10 | install steps, config or env vars, explains what it does, risk disclaimer, 9039 chars Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (2, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Broker detection | 10 / 10 | Alpaca (deps, code, readme); Interactive Brokers (code, readme) Reviewer confirmed the scanner result. Scanner evidence (2, automated, can include false matches)
|
| Total | 84 / 100 | Grades: A 85+, B 70+, C 55+, D 40+, F below. |
Grades measure public repo hygiene on the scan date. They say nothing about profits, safety or security. We did not run this code. Full rubric and patterns.
Something wrong?
Report a correction Request removal (maintainers)
Corrections and removals are public GitHub issues. We reply within 7 days and every change is in the repo history. Sponsors get no special treatment: see our policy.
Badge for your README
Once the site has a public address, shields.io can read /badge/alexanderk30--openclawderivativetrading.json from it. Badges show the grade and whether it was reviewed. Maintainers may use one without asking.